An experiment on the motives of deviant behavior

So get the facts straight. You cannot understand the intents of the given authority and how they run things, or what culture they run to suit the majority. Now is simply not a suitable time to complain. It would be wise to complain less and keep trying to expand areas of interest.

An experiment on the motives of deviant behavior

The degree of influence one receives from messages favoring deviant behavior varies by intensity, priority, frequency, and duration. An overview of differential association theory of deviance is provided beginning with a general review of the theory, followed by brief explanations of specific assumptions of differential association theory.

A brief summary of key research developments are provided. Critiques of differential association are highlighted throughout the report and further developments of the theory are reviewed.

Differential Association theory was proposed and developed by Edwin Sutherland in the late s and early s, in response to a critique of criminology by Michael and Adler Laub, In developing the theory, Sutherland dismissed the notion that individual variants such as age and gender adequately explained criminal involvement.

An experiment on the motives of deviant behavior

Differential association theory stresses the impact that others have on one's view of deviant behavior and the law. The theory relies on the social context of individuals to explain individual behaviors. Individuals learn deviant behavior through the same mechanisms that they learn other behaviors: However, he noted that mere exposure to deviant people does not necessarily result in one behaving in a criminal or deviant manner.

Rather, he suggested that the mechanisms involved in whether or not deviant behavior or criminal acts take place are more complex. He suggested that even when one is of a mindset to commit a deviant or criminal act, the social context of the situation must be perceived by the individual as an opportunity to commit the deviant or criminal act.

Differential association theory asserts that as one has more definitions favorable to the legal system over definitions unfavorable to the legal system one is less likely to be delinquent. Thus, a person becomes delinquent because of an excess of definitions unfavorable to violation of law over definitions favorable to violation law.

Differential association is a theory based on the social environment and its surroundings, individuals and the values those individuals gain from significant others in their social environment. It suggests that these definitions are learned through communications with intimate people or groups from whom the person learns the techniques, motivations, rationalizations, and attitudes.

Similarly, it does not suggest that any person who is around criminals necessarily becomes a criminal. Rather, differential association theory posits that those who have a greater ratio of unfavorable to favorable definitions of deviant behavior are more likely to deviate.

This implies that one's likelihood of deviating is subject to change, depending upon one's ratio of these definitions. Unlike some other theories of deviance and social control, one's inclination to commit crimes will vary across the life course and is not fixed at any particular stage of development or age.

Differential association theory leaves room for criminals to change their ways to become conforming people. Nine Assumptions of the Theory Sutherland ; provided the backdrop for how people obtain definitions favorable or unfavorable to violation of the law.

While explicating the theory, Sutherland suggested that the following nine assumptions guide how the theory is able to explain criminal behavior. Each assumption is reviewed below: Criminal behaviors, like all other behaviors, are learned. The theory has received criticism due to this first assumption that criminal behavior is learned in no unique way from other behaviors.

The main criticism drawn from this assumption is that the theory is overbroad by claiming to explain all behavior. Learning criminal behavior occurs through interaction with people via communication. All forms of communication are viable avenues for one to learn criminal behavior. The means through which one can learn criminal behavior through communication includes but is not limited to personal face-to-face communication, written communications such as letters and electronic mail, video chat, and telephone conversations.

Primary and intimate social groups are responsible for teaching the vast majority of criminal behaviors. The essence of this assumption is that just contact alone with criminals will not result in someone becoming a criminal.

If one's father was ever imprisoned or ever participated in criminal behavior, this does not mean that one will become a criminal. But, according to the theory, the primary and intimate social groups would include biological parents, adoptive parents, step-parents, and ex-step-parents.

It would also include siblings, more distant kin, such as cousins, aunts, and uncles, and other relatives as well. Persons other than family are also considered intimate social groups. Peers are considered a source of learning definitions unfavorable or favorable to law violation.

Likewise, school personnel and other more closely tied social groups may also provide definitions favorable or unfavorable to definitions of law violation. As one can tell from this long list of possible sources of learning definitions unfavorable or favorable to criminal acts, differential association theory is complex and may be difficult to model in social science research.

Learning criminal behavior requires knowing the techniques necessary to commit the crimes and the reasons, rationalizations, and attitudes involved with committing such criminal acts.While sociological explanations for deviant behavior focus on how social structures, forces, and relationships foster deviance, and biological explanations focus on physical and biological differences and how these might connect to deviance, psychological explanations take a different approach.

Social Control social control: the techniques and strategies for preventing deviant human behavior in any society.. occurs on all levels of society; Individuals, groups, & institutions expect us to act "properly" sanctions: penalties & rewards for conduct concerning a social norm; if we fail to live up to the norm, we may face punishment through informal sanctions (ridicule) or formal ones (jail).

Aug 23,  · Deviant behavior is behavior which does not adhere to widely-accepted social or cultural norms. For example, murder is a form of extreme deviant behavior which violates the cultural norm which states that it .

Three broad sociological classes exist that describe deviant behavior, namely, structural functionalism, symbolic interaction and conflict theory. Techniques, motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes are all learned. Excess of definitions favorable to deviation.

Importantly, people only experienced physiological self-threat when refusers had moral motives for their behavior, but not when the refusers had non-moral motives for their behavior.

Apparently, it is not deviant behavior per se that is threatening to people, but rather the moral motivation underlying it. Deviant Behavior Exam 1. STUDY. PLAY. Rational choice theory. motives and the reason and attitudes associated with the crime 4.

this learning occurs in a intimate group→ friends/ family/ etc. • what makes a behavior deviant? • what is the nature of the deviant .

Chapter 7: Deviance, Crime, and Social Control: Intro to Sociology Flash Cards: Koofers